Our 3D’s… My 4G’s…
What else can I say, having three daughters and a wife at home… Yeah, I have 4 girls in my life. So what? Believe (you) me… I am enjoying this situation. But honestly, I do wish to have a son; to carry-on our family name (lineage… tsk tsk tsk). Well, ok… I know, there are already too many “Ang’s” in this world. May be I better start a new trend… stop the virus!!! (hahahaha)
I really do not know what to write or to post. I am just too happy to be with my family after being absent for 2 weeks. Anyways, who cares… (well, my family… duuhh!!!) Owww yeah right…
Just recently, I realized that having 3 daughters is quite a blessing (ok, it is not quite but truly a blessing… my daughters might be reading this… hehehe) Just imagine, my eldest “D” at eight can bathe, feed, and put to sleep her youngest sister (my 3rd “D”), who is, as of the moment, on her 9th month. [so is the second "D", except the bathing part] And my second “D”, who is at 6, is also quite competitive. She sometimes argues with her sister (older sis) in carrying their sister (yeah the baby) and fight with her older sister over feeding her baby sister too. Because they love her (3rd “D”) so much. Thus, playing her (literally… playing the baby) makes them happy. (smile!!!!)
Many people who knew us said our kids are good (literal translation of “magaling”) and responsible. (Yeah, many thought they are adorable too…) I do agree with them, not that I love my own but those are the truth. However, we (as parents) don’t want to take all the credit. It’s a blessing from God. Yeah, it’s true sa totoo lang (I see eyebrows rising). Well, to tell you the truth… we always say “Our kids are good and responsible because their parents are lazy (literal “tamad”:) ).” You know why? It all boils down to what we “genius” call “strategy”.
When our 3rd “D” was two months old, our 1st “D” wanted to carry her. But we said, “NO!!!!!!!!”, obviously because the baby is too fragile. One time, when we left our baby (3rd “D”… yeah I know you got it already, I’m just making sure somebody wont mixed-up :)) on her crib and our 1st “D” was there with her; she (the 1st “D”) carried her up with out us noticing it. But the next time… hmmm… she wasn’t able to get away with it. (hmmm…. sounds like me when I was a child: “pasaway”) When my wife entered the room silently, she (my wife) saw her(our 1st “D”) carrying her 2 month old sister. Upon noticing that she (my wife) was there, in her surprise (no, not my wife… my 1st “D”…) she dropped her (who her?… the baby).
To cut this long dizzy story short. Instead of telling her not to do it, we taught her how to do it properly. Yehey!!!! Yeah so now, we are so blessed that we have daughters who can help us take care of our daughter. Aren’t you dizzy enough reading this? I told you, this is the reason why having 3 daughters and a wife makes my life so meaningful. Indeed, it is meaningful to have 2 responsible “D’s” and 1 cute, huggable (whatever the spelling… I know you know what I mean…) and playful “D”. And of course the love of my life… my girl…. my wife.
I am happy… very very happy!!!
Our 3 daughters… My 4 girls… What can I ask for?
I hope to follow this up with our “D’s” “dream” when they grow up…
Review of “I Am Legend”
Review of “I Am Legend”
Directed by Francis Lawrence
This is not a flick to see lightly for entertainment.
A genetically engineered virus that was supposed to cure cancer wipes out 90% of the human race instead, and turns most of the rest into mutated, rabid, aggressive, vicious, and very hungry monsters who only come out at night. Will Smith is a medical researcher who (with his faithful German Shepherd, Samantha) is the only survivor left in New York City and, for all he knows, the world. He is trying to build a vaccine and cure from his own immune blood–but it may already be too late.
There are a couple of philosophical issues of interest to Christians that are central to this story. First is the ethics of genetic engineering and “playing God.” Scientific hubris definitely takes a hit–and yet science, which is the cause of the problem, may also be its only solution. But will it be science alone? No. And thereby hangs a tale–which brings us to the second issue.
Very important also to the plot is theodicy, the problem of evil (think of C. S. Lewis’s The Problem of Pain). Smith’s character eventually meets another survivor. She is a believer who is looking for a colony of survivors. She believes it is out there because “God told her” it was. How, Smith wants to know. “The world is so silent, now,” she replies. “If you listen, you can hear Him.” Smith has lost his faith because of the devastating plague, and they have a short but intense argument about theodicy. He seems to win on points, but it turns out that the colony does exist and his meeting her is the only way his cure can reach it with hope for the future of humanity. They are attacked by the mutants and Smith sacrifices himself so that she can reach the colony with the cure. “What are you doing?” she asks him at that point. “Listening,” he replies. And so she does find the colony and the human race is presumably saved. The role of faith and the means of its validation remind one somewhat of that Mel Gibson film of a few years ago, “Signs.”
I have both a positive and a negative reaction to all of this. On the negative side, the woman’s faith is in a very vague God who apparently speaks only subjectively. It may not even be the Christian God; if it is, it is a very subjective Pentecostal or Charismatic version of Him where revelation comes not objectively through Scripture but only subjectively through an inner voice. People in the real world who “listen” to that inner voice often hear all kinds of idiocy from it, much of it contradictory to Scripture. So let’s not get too excited about “Christian” themes in this movie. Some of us are too eager to read explicit Christian content that may not be there into any film that isn’t positively hostile to faith. A work of art does not have to be explicitly Christian to be appreciated for raising in a helpful way issues worth thinking about.
On the positive side, faith in God is shown not to be bogus. There are many positive insights either made or suggested. Even Smith (in his atheist period) says, “God didn’t do this [evil]; we did.” He means at that point partly that only we humans, specifically scientists, specifically himself, can fix it. The optimistic humanist hope that “I can fix this!” echoes throughout the picture, only to be shown to be a false hope. It turns out that Smith’s efforts would have been in vain without what looks an awful lot like Providential intervention.
Most interesting of all then is the idea that Religion and Science need each other. Either alone would have failed to save humanity. The believer couldn’t have done it without Smith’s science; he couldn’t have done it without her faith. Each comes to understand and appreciate a need for the other. A more interesting and possibly helpful way of thinking about how Religion and Science ought to relate than those one sometimes hears from either side is then suggested by the story, one potentially consistent with reformed themes such as common grace and the cultural mandate.
Of the films I have seen this year, this one should be one of the more interesting to Christian thinkers. Its answers are not without flaws, but it raises good questions in a helpful way. But seriously, don’t see it unless you are prepared to have your nose rubbed in some pretty tough realities. It breaks one of the most basic rules of “feel good” movies (which “I am Legend” manifestly is not): The dog dies. And, yes, that part is hard to take. But she doesn’t die in vain. It hurts, but it is a pain worth having. Just don’t say you weren’t warned!
Source: http://www.modernreformation.org
Donald T. Williams, PhD, is Professor of English and Director of the School of Arts and Sciences at Toccoa Falls College in the hills of NE Georgia. His most recent books are Mere Humanity: G. G. Chesterton, C. S. Lewis, and J. R. R. Tolkien on the Human Condition (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2006) and Credo: Meditations on the Nicene Creed (St. Louis: Chalice Press, 2007). His website is www.doulomen.tripod.com.
Issue: “Grace Over Race” Jan./Feb. Vol. 17 No. 1 2008 Pages
Crossless Christianity
“Many Christian leaders today point to Jesus as a good moral guide (WWJD), an inspirational figure of self-sacrifice, or one who resolves our problem with loneliness. And in doing so, these shepherds have managed to avoid one of the most central teachings of the entire Bible; namely Jesus’ atoning sacrifice for sinners.”
Source: Whitehorseinn.org
Save, Share and Spend
Save, Share and Spend
By the time a child reaches the age of twenty, he’s received an average of $33,000 in allowance. That’s a lot of money! So use it as a tool to teach your children about saving, sharing and spending. First, have chores your children can do to earn the money. Next, have your kids save half of their allowance. Then help them develop a giving heart by setting aside money for church or charity.
Finally, let them spend a portion of their hard-earned money both on present wants, and earmark some for future wants. If you teach your children how to save-share-spend, you’ll be making a profound investment in their future family.
Thanks, Brother Hans
About
I am Francis Ang, a sinner saved by grace…
-
Archives
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (14)
- February 2008 (4)
- January 2008 (4)
- December 2007 (5)
- November 2007 (9)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2006 (1)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS